🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.